|
临沧翻译公司关键字：Lipper heavy criticism for Huang, in particular, his Smith-type growth and the growth of the Kuznets-type distinction, exposing his theory of economic operations of fuzzy knowledge. Smith is the type of growth and specialization by the division of labor brought economies of scale, Kuznets-type growth is driven by technological progress, economic development. Li Bozhong believe that both economic growth mode, "not necessarily linked." It should be said, in history, many areas have been the division of labor, but did not produce the economic growth and technological progress. However, the process of watching the rise of Western European economy, as mentioned earlier, only in the division of labor (collaboration) on the basis of full development, will stimulate people to engage in technological innovation, and thus there was a series of technological breakthroughs, since then, technological breakthroughs, in turn, promotes economic growth. In other words, historical fact is that only grow in the Smith-type basis, it may be the Kuznets-type growth (expansion of capitalism after the introduction of technology outside of course exceptions). As to why some regions of the division of labor did not occur in technological advances (such as ancient Athens), from the economic theory of human behavior analysis, where the market is only profitable because of the potential has been exhausted, use machines instead of manual stimulation to improve production efficiency have little or no result few people committed to improving the production technology to go study ... ... from an economic theory perspective, Smith-type growth and Kuznets-type growth is not as Lee put it, "there is no necessary link. " Huang that the from the Ming-Qing Jiangnan economy labor productivity did not see the growth, LI Bo-Smith-type re-think that there is growth, we do not judge this debate. But in my opinion, if the South really like the Ming and Qing Li Bozhong Smith has emerged as that type of growth, but failed to evolve technological progress, it was only because of restrictions on market development, technological innovation in the risk of making large expected return uncertain. As long as there is sufficient interest to stimulate, someone dedicated to inventions and activities to achieve results.
In the past, most historians regard the innovation as occasional in the production process, therefore, regard technological innovation as the economic theory of economic growth caused by the "exogenous variables." "The new system economists' discovery and stated that technological innovation is the" endogenous "in the process of Western Europe's economy, so as to historical research opens up new roads. Economic and technological rise in Western Europe and gradually spread around the world after the rest of the world (technology acceptance to), the technology of course is no longer "inside students" but "exogenous" in. But the large number of facts have shown that exogenous technology can play in how much the local role in the final analysis will depend on local market conditions. Western Europe after the textile technology spread to China, China has established a number of textile factories, but the "calico" has failed to hand textile squeeze Chinese farmers until the 1980s with "Dacron" as a symbol of new chemical products has become widespread, textile machinery was completely replaced by the rural weaving hand-spun line.
|