|
抚州翻译公司关键字：Structure based on the social system spontaneously recognize the basic logic of the system changes during the performance, the first is relatively stable inheritance of social behavior, attitudes and preferences; followed by human knowledge and intellectual products of the effective generation, dissemination and expansion; again the reasonable inference is between instinct and the evolution of cultural upbringing. This trip is not the rulers and politicians with their personal rational design results. From the Scottish Enlightenment thinkers, Smith, Menger to Hayek the evolution of the heritage down the idea that the rationalism, individual rationality in its own capacity to understand there is a logical limitations, because it will never be able to leave its own The view of its own operations. At the same time, individual rationality in the understanding of social life, there are significant limits, because the individual rationality is rooted in the rules of conduct constituted by the social system into, and thus human reason can not get rid of its formation and development of traditional and social and sober , the non-biased look at and evaluate the kind of rational person, in which tradition and society. Hayek (1997) that the highest human reason, that is, people can clearly recognize the limited nature of their reason.
Second, China's market reform ideas of the two testInstitutional change and evolution of the tools of rationalism rationalist orientation of the two determines the diameter think a critical issue that the Government changes in the system as well as the way or not. We believe that China's planned economy to a market economy, changes in the practice of various theories of institutional change, and even can be said for the system changes the orientation of two different path of thinking, providing a test platform. China's economy in the current academic theory, there was institutional change on China's two views of the differences, so that in each specific policy formulation and evaluation, there are opposing views. More mainstream understanding is that the process of China's market is supply-led system of government changes, and some young scholars tend to the interests of spontaneous type structure induced institutional change awareness. This is the tool to the North, represented by Hayek rationalism and rationalism, represented by the evolution of understanding differences. Therefore, whether institutional change of China's past history of reflection, or the future path of the structure of the system changes, clarify these two ideas are very meaningful.
1, the theoretical reflection on the NorthNorth's theory of institutional change since the late 1980s early 1990s, was introduced to China, has been widely disseminated, and scholars in China's economy strong resonance. Because the spiritual heritage of China's economic circles there are an optimistic approach constructivist rationalism thinking path, which is the North, I lay in the youth of Marx's "changing the world," the faith, and later in his theory of institutional change Construction of the new school of instrumental rationality of classical tradition and the evolution of economic organizations Alchian early optimism of the spirit of heritage down the idea is very similar. Weber's words, the theory of institutional change in North's direction and path of thinking of most Chinese economists and scholars between the spiritual heritage which has a selective affinity (Wesson, 2001). In the course of which the understanding of institutional change, as well as changes in the system's policy-making, most economists and policy makers tend to government-led.North West based on the analysis of modern economic history of the constructed theory of institutional change have repeatedly revealed, since the Middle Ages and well-defined private property rights and state protection of private property rights, the Western world, the rise of the modern market economy, the root causes (Snow Stowe Maas, 1998). North of this point will no doubt further strengthen the majority of Chinese economists over the years have been insisting on reform ideas, namely, that only a full and well-defined rigid structure of property rights in China, growth and development within society in order to market a complete economy. However, we must also be aware that North institutional analysis of property rights theory of instrumental rationality with the latent ideology, namely, that the country's rulers can maximize revenue for their consideration at random, arbitrary or deliberately invent, design , construct, create and implement any form of ownership. If not the government's economic policy makers insight into the limitations of this approach thinking path, it may cause them to China's economic reforms in the future to make the idea of ??choice is not suitable for China's choice. In China's reform, we can often see that the Government (including local government) or the impulse for reform enthusiasm for the pursuit of pure performance, or performance, the introduction of some, such as "arbitrarily arranged" type of forced corporate restructuring restructuring of the program, but most in practice showed varying degrees of inefficiency. In thousands of years of social history, China has not generated the property of a rigid system, and state that the concept of the public again in thousands of years down the heritage deeply rooted in Chinese culture. In other words, both in ancient Chinese culture, the evolution of phase, or in its modern and contemporary stage of development, in people's consciousness in the deep background not respect and protect intellectual property rights of this concept and structure. Just from this perspective, we believe that Chinese society is the problem, not the state of property rights
|