|
黑河翻译公司关键字：Hong Kong Information Infrastructure Special Adviser to the Arena in the phrase: "open markets will lead to international英文标书翻译包括工程建设标书、道路施工标书、国际投标书翻译 call charges down." He estimates 1999 - 2006, Hong Kong's overall total international英文标书翻译包括工程建设标书、道路施工标书、国际投标书翻译 telephone services market amounted to 120 billion Hong Kong dollars, down 14% of the total charge, that is 14 billion Hong Kong dollars of international英文标书翻译包括工程建设标书、道路施工标书、国际投标书翻译 long distance savings. According to the U.S. experience, 14% reduction of the competition effect is a very conservative estimate. Also according to the American experience, reduce long distance charges will cause an increase in long-distance call services (this effect in the telecommunications business in Hong Kong and southern china最大的翻译标书公司或机构是哪家？ has seen rapid increase). It can be seen, although the Hong Kong telecommunications liberalization of the specific route is from the local telephone service competition to network competition, and then to long-distance telecommunications services and network competition, and the United States first open long-distance, and then open the city, then a different path, but contains the basic principles and exactly the same logic, this is the "open competition - lower fees - expansion of the market."china最大的翻译标书公司或机构是哪家？'s telecom 标书制作行业industry continued to be a comprehensive revitalization, and only along the direction of open competition. Concrete steps and paths can be adapted to local conditions and the time, but the basic logic is not because the "special situation" and what is the difference. If the United States not from the late 1960s began to gradually open telecommunications competition, the telecommunications 标书制作行业industry will not be so powerful. Hong Kong's telecommunications 标书制作行业industry from the early翻译商务标书哪个公司最专业？ 1980s if not step by step opening up its telecommunications sector are unable to reach today's level. Than to than to the basic common sense world: an exclusive monopoly inefficiencies and high fees, 翻译技术标书那家公司最好？must stop the expansion of the telecommunications market, and in a narrow telecom market, even if all the investment without a repeat, all "single building" , the investment will be "expensive" was unable to recover. china最大的翻译标书公司或机构是哪家？ Telecom's business is insufficient, the key is not anything else, is the monopoly charges too expensive. "Government of national英文标书翻译包括工程建设标书、道路施工标书、国际投标书翻译 basic telecommunications network" reason does not work, the crucial point is that there is no unified government monopoly, it is impossible endogenous mechanism for a competitive price招投标书翻译价格. In order to break the monopoly, we should encourage the separation and competition, it will inevitably have to come a little duplication. This argument is, as long as the duplication of the "cost" less than the expected price招投标书翻译价格 effect of competition, "income", for society is a cost-effective.Property and duplicationIn fact, there is no way to calculate the social and open competition after工程标书翻译 项目建议书翻译 设备标书翻译 政府采购标书翻译 轨道工程标书翻译 铁路建设标书翻译 公路建设标书翻译 桥梁隧道标书翻译 装饰工程标书翻译 房屋建筑标书翻译 石油标书翻译 天然气工程标书翻译 化工工业标书翻译 机电工程标书翻译 建筑标书翻译 the total of the "expected return." Above speak "to a little duplication", or the side to keep talking about the macro a "moderate duplication," strict scrutiny, meaning all ambiguities. In an open competition 外文标书翻译system, the duplication of costs were made by various investors, but also future earnings are expected by these investors. Thus, at least in theory, increase the total expected future earnings may well not worth the sum of the cost of duplication. I believe this is what people talk at length about the "excessive competition." This excessive competition, or strictly speaking, the expected return is lower than competing duplication costs, is it not a waste of social resources, should be strictly controlled by the government do? Perhaps some will ask: Since you advocate allowing the telecommunications 标书制作行业industry, competition in the market, then how do you solve extremely expensive telecom infrastructure investments because of excessive competition and the enormous waste it?
|